In the January issue of the Connection, we argued that the current uncertain macro environment is a good time to shift portfolios towards a higher strategic allocation to private assets. Each of the major private asset classes offers unique features which add arrows to an investor’s quiver that are particularly valuable in uncertain times.
Private credit currently offers a high yield while being more senior in the capital structure than equities. Private equities have outperformed public equities over time, but importantly also around recessions. Private real estate has historically offered a degree of inflation protection. All three asset classes offer diversification to traditional portfolios, which is a scarcer commodity in the current environment.[ 1 ]
In this and future issues we plan to look into the key decisions that are integral to implement this shift. Here we highlight the importance of manager selection, which we believe matters much more in private markets than in public markets.
This is illustrated in Figure 5 below, which shows the range of outcomes across managers that investors have experienced over the last five years. The range is much wider for private assets than for public assets. The significant dispersion underscores that the rewards to effective manager selection are high in private markets. The gap between the first and fourth quartile ranges from more than 5 percentage points (pp) over the period for Private Credit to ~15pp for Private Equity, whereas in public equities and credit the range is just a few percentage points. To us, the wider performance gap represents the range of approaches and capabilities that private markets managers can bring to the table.
Figure 5: The Range of Outcomes is Much Wider Across Private Managers than for Public Managers
The Convergence of Data Centers and Power: A Generational Investment Opportunity | The Connection
October 31, 2024